![]() |
|||
|
Natural Family Planning vs Contraception |
|||
|
Artificial contraceptives:
To order brochures in English or in Spanish, go here.
The fundamental difference between NFP and contraception involves both the methods used and the intentions of the couple. With contraception, a couple uses a method that directly contradicts the nature of their sexual act, by deliberately making it sterile. The clearest illustration of this is the use of a condom -- the couple is not only intervening to prevent pregnancy, they are literally placing a barrier between themselves, which is contrary to the full self-giving nature of married love. Likewise, with a hormonal contraceptive (e.g., "the pill"), the couple is making their love conditional, by essentially saying that they will not give themselves to each other unless a healthy part of the woman's body is turned off. Contraception necessarily involves a rejection of the nature of who we are, and a rejection of who our spouse is. With NFP, the couple cooperates with the nature that is written into their bodies, with the natural cycle that is a necessary part of their fertility. They accept that there are some times in their cycle that they are fertile, and others in which they are not. They are able to accept each other as they are made, and to give themselves to each other unconditionally. In
more practical terms, as pointed out by the U.S. Bishops' NFP
Office (http://www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/nfp/myths.shtml) : Download this talk by Janet E. Smith, PHD: "Contraception: Why Not?" (New Edition)
|
|||
|
|
Home |Bereavement |Chastity |Calendar |Espanol |Marriage Enrichment |Marriage Preparation |Family Planning |Parenting |Public Policy |Respect Life |Separated or Divorced |Young Adults